<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Potter vs Cullen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/fandom/potter-vs-cullen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/fandom/potter-vs-cullen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:36:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol ann</title>
		<link>http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/fandom/potter-vs-cullen/comment-page-1/#comment-3817</link>
		<dc:creator>carol ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/?p=265#comment-3817</guid>
		<description>i like potter but it edward is more vivid than him...i love edward more than potter...Ü</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like potter but it edward is more vivid than him&#8230;i love edward more than potter&#8230;Ü</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrittika</title>
		<link>http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/fandom/potter-vs-cullen/comment-page-1/#comment-3805</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrittika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/?p=265#comment-3805</guid>
		<description>Well edward is cool and harry is cool too. I like both of them very much. But there must be any competition between them. They are both famous equally, i think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well edward is cool and harry is cool too. I like both of them very much. But there must be any competition between them. They are both famous equally, i think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shayla</title>
		<link>http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/fandom/potter-vs-cullen/comment-page-1/#comment-1739</link>
		<dc:creator>shayla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/?p=265#comment-1739</guid>
		<description>EDWARD!!!! 

Edward Cullen wo0ld knock Potter down before Potter even had a chance to do something...He wo0ld take Potters Fake wond and break it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EDWARD!!!! </p>
<p>Edward Cullen wo0ld knock Potter down before Potter even had a chance to do something&#8230;He wo0ld take Potters Fake wond and break it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/fandom/potter-vs-cullen/comment-page-1/#comment-1680</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/?p=265#comment-1680</guid>
		<description>Checkit out. Potter and Twilight go a long way back in the comparison and Imma tell you this right now: Potter always wins. Potter has the wider fan base, and a dedicated core of fans. As far as movies, it&#039;s got better effects and, arguably better drama (for a wider audience anyway). 

The Potter movie is getting its typical bout of attention. It&#039;s just hard for your to see, you have two rabid Twilighters screaming in your ear. ;). Yes, the hype for New Moon is greater, but that&#039;s only because Twilighters are - for whatever reason - a lot more vocal about their passion than the Potterites.

As far as box office...I&#039;d bet on Potter to take the most bling for the year, but we&#039;ll see. New Moon is definitely gonna pack a punch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checkit out. Potter and Twilight go a long way back in the comparison and Imma tell you this right now: Potter always wins. Potter has the wider fan base, and a dedicated core of fans. As far as movies, it&#8217;s got better effects and, arguably better drama (for a wider audience anyway). </p>
<p>The Potter movie is getting its typical bout of attention. It&#8217;s just hard for your to see, you have two rabid Twilighters screaming in your ear. <img src='http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Yes, the hype for New Moon is greater, but that&#8217;s only because Twilighters are &#8211; for whatever reason &#8211; a lot more vocal about their passion than the Potterites.</p>
<p>As far as box office&#8230;I&#8217;d bet on Potter to take the most bling for the year, but we&#8217;ll see. New Moon is definitely gonna pack a punch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jac Star</title>
		<link>http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/fandom/potter-vs-cullen/comment-page-1/#comment-1679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jac Star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/?p=265#comment-1679</guid>
		<description>At this point I don&#039;t think anything could hurt Harry Potter.

I love both series - so I mean no disrespect to either

But Harry Potter has already got it&#039;s followers and i wouldn&#039;t be surprised if a good percentage of those followers are part of the Twilight phenomenon as well

So really, Harry Potter can&#039;t fail :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point I don&#8217;t think anything could hurt Harry Potter.</p>
<p>I love both series &#8211; so I mean no disrespect to either</p>
<p>But Harry Potter has already got it&#8217;s followers and i wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if a good percentage of those followers are part of the Twilight phenomenon as well</p>
<p>So really, Harry Potter can&#8217;t fail <img src='http://www.whereisedwardcullen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

